In a nutshell,
virtio is an abstraction layer over devices in a paravirtualized hypervisor.
virtio was developed by Rusty Russell in support of his own virtualization solution called
lguest. This article begins with an introduction to paravirtualization and emulated devices, and then explores the details of
virtio. The focus is on the
virtio framework from the 2.6.30 kernel release.
Linux is the hypervisor playground. As my article on Linux as a hypervisor showed, Linux offers a variety of hypervisor solutions with different attributes and advantages. Examples include the Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM),
lguest, and User-mode Linux. Having these different hypervisor solutions on Linux can tax the operating system based on their independent needs. One of the taxes is virtualization of devices. Rather than have a variety of device emulation mechanisms (for network, block, and other drivers),
virtio provides a common front end for these device emulations to standardize the interface and increase the reuse of code across the platforms.
Full virtualization vs. paravirtualization
Let’s start with a quick discussion of two distinct types of virtualization schemes: full virtualization and paravirtualization. In full virtualization, the guest operating system runs on top of a hypervisor that sits on the bare metal. The guest is unaware that it is being virtualized and requires no changes to work in this configuration. Conversely, in paravirtualization, the guest operating system is not only aware that it is running on a hypervisor but includes code to make guest-to-hypervisor transitions more efficient (see Figure 1).
In the full virtualization scheme, the hypervisor must emulate device hardware, which is emulating at the lowest level of the conversation (for example, to a network driver). Although the emulation is clean at this abstraction, it’s also the most inefficient and highly complicated. In the paravirtualization scheme, the guest and the hypervisor can work cooperatively to make this emulation efficient. The downside to the paravirtualization approach is that the operating system is aware that it’s being virtualized and requires modifications to work.
Figure 1. Device emulation in full virtualization and paravirtualization environments
Hardware continues to change with virtualization. New processors incorporate advanced instructions to make guest operating systems and hypervisor transitions more efficient. And hardware continues to change for input/output (I/O) virtualization, as well (see resources on the right to learn about Peripheral Controller Interconnect [PCI] passthrough and single- and multi-root I/O virtualization).
But in traditional full virtualization environments, the hypervisor must trap these requests, and then emulate the behaviors of real hardware. Although doing so provides the greatest flexibility (namely, running an unmodified operating system), it does introduce inefficiency (see the left side of Figure 1). The right side of Figure 1 shows the paravirtualization case. Here, the guest operating system is aware that it’s running on a hypervisor and includes drivers that act as the front end. The hypervisor implements the back-end drivers for the particular device emulation. These front-end and back-end drivers are where
virtio comes in, providing a standardized interface for the development of emulated device access to propagate code reuse and increase efficiency.
An abstraction for Linux guests
From the previous section, you can see that
virtio is an abstraction for a set of common emulated devices in a paravirtualized hypervisor. This design allows the hypervisor to export a common set of emulated devices and make them available through a common application programming interface (API). Figure 2 illustrates why this is important. With paravirtualized hypervisors, the guests implement a common set of interfaces, with the particular device emulation behind a set of back-end drivers. The back-end drivers need not be common as long as they implement the required behaviors of the front end.
Figure 2. Driver abstractions with virtio
Note that in reality (though not required), the device emulation occurs in user space using QEMU, so the back-end drivers communicate into the user space of the hypervisor to facilitate I/O through QEMU. QEMU is a system emulator that, in addition to providing a guest operating system virtualization platform, provides emulation of an entire system (PCI host controller, disk, network, video hardware, USB controller, and other hardware elements).
virtio API relies on a simple buffer abstraction to encapsulate the command and data needs of the guest. Let’s look at the internals of the
virtio API and its components.
In addition to the front-end drivers (implemented in the guest operating system) and the back-end drivers (implemented in the hypervisor),
virtio defines two layers to support guest-to-hypervisor communication. At the top level (called virtio) is the virtual queue interface that conceptually attaches front-end drivers to back-end drivers. Drivers can use zero or more queues, depending on their need. For example, the
virtio network driver uses two virtual queues (one for receive and one for transmit), where the
virtio block driver uses only one. Virtual queues, being virtual, are actually implemented as rings to traverse the guest-to-hypervisor transition. But this could be implemented any way, as long as both the guest and hypervisor implement it in the same way.
Figure 3. High-level architecture of the virtio framework
As shown in Figure 3, five front-end drivers are listed for block devices (such as disks), network devices, PCI emulation, a balloon driver (for dynamically managing guest memory usage), and a console driver. Each front-end driver has a corresponding back-end driver in the hypervisor.
From the perspective of the guest, an object hierarchy is defined as shown in Figure 4. At the top is the
virtio_driver, which represents the front-end driver in the guest. Devices that match this driver are encapsulated by the
virtio_device (a representation of the device in the guest). This refers to the
virtio_config_ops structure (which defines the operations for configuring the
virtio device). The
virtio_device is referred to by the
virtqueue (which includes a reference to the
virtio_device to which it serves). Finally, each
virtqueue object references the
virtqueue_ops object, which defines the underlying queue operations for dealing with the hypervisor driver. Although the queue operations are the core of the
virtio API, I provide a brief discussion of discovery, and then explore the
virtqueue_ops operations in more detail.
Figure 4. Object hierarchy of the virtio front end
The process begins with the creation of a
virtio_driver and subsequent registration via
virtio_driver structure defines the upper-level device driver, list of device IDs that the driver supports, a features table (dependent upon the device type), and a list of callback functions. When the hypervisor identifies the presence of a new device that matches a device ID in the device list, the
probe function is called (provided in the
virtio_driver object) to pass up the
virtio_device object. This object is cached with the management data for the device (in a driver-dependent way). Depending on the driver type, the
virtio_config_ops functions may be invoked to get or set options specific to the device (for example, getting the Read/Write status of the disk for a
virtio_blk device or setting the block size of the block device).
Note that the
virtio_device includes no reference to the
virtqueue (but the
virtqueue does reference the
virtio_device). To identify the
virtqueues that associate with this
virtio_device, you use the
virtio_config_ops object with the
find_vq function. This object returns the virtual queues associated with this
virtio_device instance. The
find_vq function also permits the specification of a callback function for the
virtqueue (see the
virtqueue structure in Figure 4), which is used to notify the guest of response buffers from the hypervisor.
virtqueue is a simple structure that identifies an optional callback function (which is called when the hypervisor consumes the buffers), a reference to the
virtio_device, a reference to the
virtqueue operations, and a special
priv reference that refers to the underlying implementation to use. Although the
callback is optional, it’s possible to enable or disable callbacks dynamically.
But the core of this hierarchy is the
virtqueue_ops, which defines how commands and data are moved between the guest and the hypervisor. Let’s first explore the object that is added or removed from the
Guest (front-end) drivers communicate with hypervisor (back-end) drivers through buffers. For an I/O, the guest provides one or more buffers representing the request. For example, you could provide three buffers, with the first representing a Read request and the subsequent two buffers representing the response data. Internally, this configuration is represented as a scatter-gather list (with each entry in the list representing an address and a length).
Linking the guest driver and hypervisor driver occurs through the
virtio_device and most commonly through
virtqueue supports its own API consisting of five functions. You use the first function,
add_buf, to provide a request to the hypervisor. This request is in the form of the scatter-gather list discussed previously. To
add_buf, the guest provides the
virtqueue to which the request is to be enqueued, the scatter-gather list (an array of addresses and lengths), the number of buffers that serve as out entries (destined for the underlying hypervisor), and the number of in entries (for which the hypervisor will store data and return to the guest). When a request has been made to the hypervisor through
add_buf, the guest can notify the hypervisor of the new request using the
kick function. For best performance, the guest should load as many buffers as possible onto the
virtqueue before notifying through
Responses from the hypervisor occur through the
get_buf function. The guest can poll simply by calling this function or wait for notification through the provided
virtqueue callback function. When the guest learns that buffers are available, the call to
get_buf returns the completed buffers.
The final two functions in the
virtqueue API are
disable_cb. You can use these functions to enable and disable the callback process (via the
callback function initialized in the
virtqueue through the
find_vq function). Note that the callback function and the hypervisor are in separate address spaces, so the call occurs through an indirect hypervisor call (such as
The format, order, and contents of the buffers are meaningful only to the front-end and back-end drivers. The internal transport (rings in the current implementation) move only buffers and have no knowledge of their internal representation.
Example virtio drivers
You can find the source to the various front-end drivers within the ./drivers subdirectory of the Linux kernel. The
virtio network driver can be found in ./drivers/net/virtio_net.c, and the
virtio block driver can be found in ./drivers/block/virtio_blk.c. The subdirectory ./drivers/virtio provides the implementation of the
virtio interfaces (
virtio device, driver,
virtqueue, and ring).
virtio has also been used in High-Performance Computing (HPC) research to develop inter-virtual machine (VM) communications through shared memory passing. Specifically, this was implemented through a virtualized PCI interface using the
virtio PCI driver. You can learn more about this work in the resources section on the right.
You can exercise this paravirtualization infrastructure today in the Linux kernel. All you need is a kernel to act as the hypervisor, a guest kernel, and QEMU for device emulation. You can use either KVM (a module that exists in the host kernel) or with Rusty Russell’s
lguest (a modified Linux guest kernel). Both of these virtualization solutions support
virtio (along with QEMU for system emulation and
libvirt for virtualization management).
The result of Rusty’s work is a simpler code base for paravirtualized drivers and faster emulation of virtual devices. But even more important,
virtio has been found to provide better performance (2-3 times for network I/O) than current commercial solutions. This performance boost comes at a cost, but it’s well worth it if Linux is your hypervisor and guest.
Although you may never develop front-end or back-end drivers for
virtio, it implements an interesting architecture and is worth understanding in more detail.
virtio opens up new opportunities for efficiency in paravirtualized I/O environments while building from previous work in Xen. Linux continues to prove itself as a production hypervisor and a research platform for new virtualization technologies.
virtio is yet another example of the strengths and openness of Linux as a hypervisor.